SKU: 90120577949

Cabell County, Virginia 1810 Substitute Census by John Vogt

Sale price$12.55 Regular price$13.95
Save 10%

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 12 - Jul 17

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

Cabell County, Virginia 1810 Substitute Census by John VogtCabell's 1810 census was destroyed during the War of 1812, and the abstracted personal property tax list offers a substitute census for the head of households. Abstracted from original Personal Property Tax Records in the Library of Virginia. Cabell is one of eighteen Virginia counties for which the 1810 census is lost. In August, 1814 British troops occupied Washington, DC and public buildings were put to the torch. In the destruction that followed,

Cabell's 1810 census was destroyed during the War of 1812, and the abstracted personal property tax list offers a substitute census for the head of households.

Abstracted from original Personal Property Tax Records in the Library of Virginia.

Cabell is one of eighteen Virginia counties for which the 1810 census is lost. In August, 1814 British troops occupied Washington, DC and public buildings were put to the torch. In the destruction that followed, numerous early records of the government were lost, including all of Virginia’s 1790 and 1800 census reports, as well as eighteen county lists for the state's most recent [1810] federal census. Although two “fair copies” of each county’s census had been left in the counties for public display, these were ephemeral lists and not preserved, and by 1814 they too had been mislaid, lost, or destroyed. Hence, the closest document available we have to reconstruct a partial image of the missing county lists is the personal property tax list.

According to research notes by Minor T. Weisiger, Library of Virginia archivist: “Information recorded in Virginia personal property tax records changed gradually from 1782 to 1865. The early laws required the tax commissioner in each district to record in “a fair alphabetical list” the names of the person chargeable with the tax, the names of white male tithables over the age of twenty-one, the number of white male tithables between ages sixteen and twenty-one, the number of slaves both above and below age sixteen, various types of animals such as horses and cattle, carriage wheels, ordinary licenses, and even billiard tables. Free Negroes are listed by name and often denoted in the list as “free” or “FN.”

The present abstract of Cabell's 1810 personal property tax list is NOT a transcript of the entire document; rather, it is a summary of three items important in delineating the 1810 "substitute" census for this county, i.e., number of male tithables 16 and older, number of slaves twelve years and older, and the number of horses. The original form of the census was in alphabetic order by date and letter. The substitute list presented here is in absolute alphabetic order for easy reference.

In the current volume, the data is recorded thus:
        Kincaid, Samuel J.r           -        -        5
        Kincaid, Samuel S.r        3        5        11
        Kincaid, Samuel
            (blacksmith)                1        -        -

Column one represents the tithable males (16 and over) in the household; column 2 is the number of slaves over 12; and the final column is the number of horses, mares or mules.

For genealogical researchers in this 1810 period, personal property tax records may provide additional important information. Oftentimes, juniors and seniors are listed adjacent to one another and recorded on the same day. When a taxpayer is noted as “exempt”, it can be a clue to someone holding a particular position in government or being elderly, infirm, or for some other reason no longer required to pay the tithable tax. Women, both black and white, appear occasionally as heads of households when they own property in their own right or as the widow of a property owner.

Another valuable source for filling in information about an ancestor is the land tax record, and especially the one for 1815. In that year, the enumerators began to add the location of the property in relation to the county court house. Roger Ward has abstracted all of the 1815 land tax records, and they are available as well. This is especially important in the case of Cabell, which was a parent to all or part of eight West Virginia counties (Cabell, Wayne, Lincoln, Putnam, Mingo, Logan, Boone & Wyoming)

The 1810 substitute census list for Cabell County contains 487 households, 524 tithables, both white and free black, and 122 slaves over the age of twelve, and 1,169 horses.

Surnames found in this book:

Adams; Adkins; Aldridge; Allsbury; Amos; Amoss; Ansel; Armstrong; Artrip; Austin;

Baker; Ball; Ballard; Barhart; Barnes; Barrett; Barton; Bartrum; Bartrurn; Bean; Beller; Bellowmy; Benson; Bias; Blankenship; Blew; Bloss ; Boalt; Boothe; Booton; Bostick; Boyd; Brammer; Brewer; Brian; Brown; Brumfield; Buffington; Burcham; Burns; Burris; Burton;

Camell; Cardwell; Carter; Cartmill; Casey; Chapman; Christain; Clap; Clark; Clevenger; Collins; Comeans; Conly; Cornwell; Cox; Crump; Comeans;

Damron; Dunbar; Daniel; Davidson; Davis; Dearing; Dennis; Dial; Dingess; Donathan; Douthit; Droddy; Dunkel; Durton;

Elkins; Ellis; Ellison; Emmons; Epling; Erwin; Estell; Estes; Evans;

Farler; Ferel; Ford; Forgey; Forguson; Forgy; France; Friley; Frily; Fudge; Fullerton; Fuson;

Garrett; Gilkerson; Godby; Grant; Gray; Greenwood; Griffith; Guin; Gumby;

Hagley; Halverson; Hampton; Haner; Haney; Hannon; Harbour; Harrison; Haskins; Hatcher; Hatfield; Hatton; Hauger; Hayman; Hazlet; Heath; Henry; Hervey; Higgins; Hillyard; Hisey; Hite; Hodge; Hogan; Holderbey; Holenback; Holland; Hollenbach; Hoskinson; Howard; Howe; Howel; Huddleston; Huggard; Hull; Hulman; Hutchison; Hutsan;

Jarrott; Johnston; Jones; Jourdan; Jourden;

Keesee; Kelly; Kilgore; Kirk;

Lambert; Lankford; Lee; Lore; Love;

Marcum; McComas; McCown; McCoy; McGinnis; McNealy; Meritt; Merritt; Miller; Moore; Morgan; Morris; Morrison; Mount; Muncey;

Nance; Napper; Neal; Nelson; Newman; Nicolas; Nuil (Neal);

Parsons; Paully; Payton; Peary; Perdew; Peters; Peyton; Phillips; Picket; Pine; Porter; Prate; Puthuff; Puzey;

Randal; Rea; Read; Rece; Reuby; Rice; Rife; Riggs; Ripley; Robertson; Robinson; Roffe; Rogers; Russell; Rutherford;

Salmons; Sample; Sansom; Saunders; Saxton; Scales; Scidmore; Shelton; Short; Simmons; Sirus; Slaughter; Smiley; Smith; Snell; Snodgras; Snodgrass; Southerland; Spears; Sperry; Spurlock; Stafford; Stallings; Stephens; Stephenson; Stewart; Stokes; Stone; Stout; Strupe; Swearingem; Syrus;

Tally; Taylor; Taylor; Thompson; Tiller; Toney; Trent; Tule; Turly;

Vaughan;

Walker; Wallace; Walton; Ward; Ware; Wellman; White; Wilks; Williams; Williamson; Wilson; Wintz; Wishon; Witcher; Wood; Woodward; Woosely; Workman;

Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 90120577949

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.4 ★★★★★
Based on 718 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
W
Verified Purchase
Wesley
Massapequa, US
★★★★★ 1
It’s a hard no from me
Color: Black, Size: Upgraded Base-1 Panel
I ordered two of these black, single screen panels several months ago. I ordered an additional four I needed a few days ago so I would have the total of 6 that I ended up needing. I did so by clicking on my past order (2 screens) item page and simply placed my recent order for 4 more. Two of the six screens have bolts that don’t fully screw down, such that one of each panel’s four points where the screen attaches to the two legs isn’t fully screwed down and flush. As a result, the screen doesn’t stay entirely vertical -It’s warped askew. Also, 3 of the six screens are different heights than the other 3. It’s clear to me that this company has ZERO QUALITY CONTROL, as there’s not anything that is even adjustable on these screens that leaves room for user error. Additionally, there are four black rubber circles that come in the “parts/screws” bag that don’t have corresponding installation instructions in the instruction manual. Just spend a little more and go with a better quality product somewhere else.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 1, 2025
M
Verified Purchase
Matthew D
San Leandro, US
★★★★★ 5
Great multipurpose wall
Color: Black, Size: Upgraded Base-1 Panel, Color: Black, Size: Upgraded Base-1 Panel
Perfect for her to hide behind
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 5, 2026
M
Verified Purchase
Mike
Natrona Heights, US
★★★★★ 5
Works For Desired Use
Color: Black, Size: 4 Panel-136‘’W-Round Pad
I recently purchased the Room Divider 6FT Folding Privacy Screens, 4 Panel Partition Room Dividers, and I must say, it has transformed the way I use my living space. The four-panel design is both elegant and functional, providing instant privacy without feeling bulky or overwhelming in my room. Setting it up was a breeze; the folding mechanism is smooth, allowing me to adjust the configuration as needed—straight, angled, or zigzag. I particularly appreciate the sturdy build; the panels feel solid yet lightweight, making it easy to move around when I want to reconfigure my space. Aesthetically, it’s a great addition. The neutral finish blends well with my décor, and the simple design doesn’t draw too much attention while still offering a sense of separation. It’s perfect for creating a temporary office corner, dividing a studio apartment, or even using it as a backdrop for online meetings. If I had to point out a minor downside, it would be that the divider isn’t completely soundproof—so conversations can still carry through—but for visual privacy and space management, it’s excellent. Overall, I’m extremely satisfied and would recommend it to anyone looking for a versatile and stylish room divider.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 24, 2026
A
Verified Purchase
Ansley
Bozeman, US
★★★★★ 5
True to size & Use a Drill
Color: Beige, Size: 3 Panel-102‘’-Round Pad, Color: Beige, Size: 3 Panel-102‘’-Round Pad
Love this! Works perfectly for where I wanted it. I did measure my room incorrectly and thought it would be smaller, thankfully it’s not and thankfully it’s not bigger than the room itself. I did like how the whole thing was move-able but it was a bit annoying so I just added extra clips to the left of the middle one and unscrewed the right of the middle at the bottom so it opens like a door, this did make it a bit flimsy but duck taping it to the wall as anchor it works. 100% recommend, but do suggest a drill and a second set of hands to put it together, due to its size it can be a bit difficult to maneuver putting together yourself. Also if you have a clingy cat like I do, and think this will help keep them out, no, my cat who is very large can manage to squeeze underneath it.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 9, 2024
S
Verified Purchase
Sam
Fort Morgan, US
★★★★★ 1
waste of money
Color: Black, Size: 4 Panel-136‘’W-Round Pad
This is a total waste of money. Its only going to free stand if you arent moving it. If you are planning on dividing a room, and then folding these for space and then dividing the room again, itll last a few days. The poles kept coming off of the screws that holds the fabric on the poles together. Was fixing this EVERY DAY. Finally got tired of doing this and just threw it out. Lot of money spent on garbage. Get a sheet room divider, or something that isnt cheaply made. Was simply making an office type space in a bedroom, to seperate the two areas for work, and folding it kept making the poles come off those twisted screws. just not worth it.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 3, 2026

recommand products