SKU: 94640383801

Absolute Mesopotamian chronology: From Sargon of Akkad (2243Ð2187) to Nabonidus (556Ð539)

Sale price$32.71 Regular price$36.34
Save 10%

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 11 - Jul 16

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

Absolute Mesopotamian chronology: From Sargon of Akkad (2243Ð2187) to Nabonidus (556Ð539)The 614 Assyrian eponyms between the first year of _am_ Adad I and the first year of Tiglath pileser I (1115 1076) allow us to date approximately the reign of _am_ Adad I (1728 1695). As the Assyrian years were lunar before the reign of Ninurta apil Ekur (1192 1179), this makes it possible to slightly correct the reign of _am_ Adad I (1712 1680), yet as this Amorite king died in the 17th 18th year of King Hammurabi, so this synchronism fixes the

The 614 Assyrian eponyms between the first year of _am_”-Adad I and the first year of Tiglath-pileser I (1115-1076) allow us to date approximately the reign of _am_”-Adad I (1728-1695). As the Assyrian years were lunar before the reign of Ninurta-apil-Ekur (1192-1179), this makes it possible to slightly correct the reign of _am_”-Adad I (1712-1680), yet as this Amorite king died in the 17th/18th year of King Hammurabi, so this synchronism fixes the dating of this Babylonian king (1697-1654). This dating does not correspond to the Middle Chronology but exactly satisfies the astronomical dating of the Ammisaduqa tablet on Venus, according to the Ultra-Low Chronology. In addition, one tablet of astronomical omens (Enuma Anu Enlil 20) mentions a lunar eclipse dated 14 Simanu at the end of the reign of _ulgi (14/III/48, 27 June 1954 BCE), and another (Enuma Anu Enlil 21) mentions a lunar eclipse dated 14 Addaru at the end of the third dynasty Ur, which ended with the reign of Ibbi-Sin (14/XII/24, 6 March 1911 BCE). These two total lunar eclipses are separated by 42 years of reign (= 9 years of Amar-Sin + 9 years of _u-S”n + 24 years of Ibbi-Sin) and 9 months (=XII - III). During the period 2200Ð1850 BCE, there was only one couple of lunar eclipses spaced 42 years and 9 months apart, and visible at Ur, corresponding to the description of the astronomical omens. These two total lunar eclipses confirm the absolute dating of the reign of Hammurabi (1697Ð1654) and allow to anchor the reign of Sargon of Akkad (2243Ð2187). Secondly, as there is a synchronism between Neferhotep I (1701-1690) and Ibni-Addu (1700-1680), the king of Hazor, and another synchronism between Ibni-Addu and Hammurabi (1697-1654), the king of Babylon, this reign could be determined indirectly by carbon-14 and is again in perfect agreement with the ÒUltra-Low chronologyÓ. Finally, the best confirmation of the accuracy of this absolute chronology is the complete reconstitution from 2040 to 1050 BCE, year by year, of the main Mesopotamian chronologies: Uruk IV, Mari, Gutium, Assyria, Elam, Uruk V, Ur III, Larsa, Isin I, Babylon, Hana, Kassite and Sealand, with their synchronisms as well as their dates anchored on astronomical phenomena such as the total eclipses of the moon (Gertoux, NABU 2021-3, 171-172).

Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 94640383801

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.7 ★★★★★
Based on 2122 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
D
Daniel Entringer
Belleville, US
★★★★★ 1
Chew
Size: Medium, Size: Medium
Destroyed in less then 5 minutes ;(
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on December 26, 2024
G
Verified Purchase
Gina Reed
Louisville, US
★★★★★ 5
The bone lasted a long time.
My border collie is a chewer. I can look at a toy and tell you how long it’s going to last. This bone has lasted months and she still will grab it and chew on it.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 20, 2026
J
Verified Purchase
Jk
Chelsea, US
★★★★★ 5
⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ 5/5 – Finally, a Dog Toy That Actually Lasts!
We picked up this natural leather bone dog toy hoping it would survive longer than the usual toys our dog destroys in a day—and wow, it exceeded every expectation. The leather is thick, durable, and clearly great quality. Our dog has tried his best to tear it apart (like he does with every toy), but this one has held strong. It’s been weeks now, and the toy still looks almost new. No frayed seams, no stuffing everywhere, no pieces breaking off. Just a solid, long-lasting toy that keeps our dog entertained without us having to constantly replace it. If you’re tired of wasting money on toys that only last a few hours, this natural leather bone is absolutely worth it. Tough, safe, and built to last—our dog loves it, and so do we!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on November 18, 2025
C
Verified Purchase
Corglet
Alexandria, US
★★★★★ 4
Great chew toys
Dogs love! Not rough on teeth. They do tend to pull long strings of thread off the leather and felt, which must be intercepted and cut off lest we have a string linear foreign body. I wish the whole held together a bit better. Fierce corgis can go through these pretty quickly.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 5, 2026
K
Verified Purchase
Karlee
Natrona Heights, US
★★★★★ 5
Long lasting
My dog still plays with this and we have at it for months! Great chew toy for chewers, took her awhile to chew into it and even if pieces fall off I know it is not plastic. Great value for the money. Does not squeak so that’s a plus!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 4, 2026

recommand products